There are many recommended useful websites for the task of weeding but the site i find to be of greatest assistance and relevance is ‘The School Library Media Specialist’ website by Lamb, Annette and Johnson, Larry 2005. http://eduscapes.com/sms/access/weeding.html

Reasons being:

  1. Comprehensive with many topical and useful links for further exploration eg links to CREW Method as well as pertinent powerpoint slides.
  2. User-friendly, interesting use of visuals and inclusion of book jacket of examples of books that shd be deselected.
  3. Simple language makes interesting and light reading.

Another useful website for the topic of weeding(deselection) is ‘Secret library busines-part 2 by Renate Beilharz that appeared in Connections SCIS, Issue 63, Term 4 (2007).  http://www2.curriculum.edu.au/scis/connections/issue_63/secret_library_business__part_2.html.  The article is a good summary of key points raised by the books listed below:

Baumbach, Donna J and Linda L Miller 2006, Less is More: A practical guide to weeding school library collections, American Library Association, Chicago.

Johnson, Doug 2003, Weed! [Accessed 15 August 2007]
http://www.doug-johnson.com/dougwri/weed.html

Kennedy, John 2006, Collection Management: A concise introduction, Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW.

Lamb, Annette and Johnson, Larry 2005, Collection Maintenance and Weeding [Accessed 15 August 2007]
http://eduscapes.com/sms/access/weeding.html

Personally, i do not think the use of the term ‘weeding’ denigrates the task. In fact, it clearly explains simply and in ordinary layman term the task of removing unwanted items in the library (‘garden’). The distinction being the case of the library being controllable while that of the garden concept is one which is beyond the control of the gardener/owner. There will be lesser need to weed or deselect, if the library resources had been more accurately developed based on the information and curricular needs of the school. Hence, the term ‘deselect’ is one which i feel i a more professional and appropriate use as it is the direct reverse of ‘selection’ process. If there is no selection then there wld not be any ‘deselection’!

Deselection is just as important a process as selection as a good and well resourced library must be one that contains accurate, relevant and current resources that meets the curriculum and recreational needs of the students and the teaching faculty of the school.

For a school library collection, the order of deselection criteria is listed below. As an advocate of Hughes-Hassell and Mancall (2005, p.33) selection criteria, i wld put ‘NO LONGER MEETING NEEDS OF CURRICULUM’ as top criteria over and above appearance or space constraints.

Order of deselection criteria:

  1. No longer meeting the information and curriculum needs of the school
  2. Age
  3. Physical Condition-Aesthetics
  4. Freeing up space
  5. Currency of content
  6. Duplication
  7. Bias
  8. Obsolete Formats
Advertisements